Responding to the ridicule of teachers and the teaching profession by politicians and self proclaimed "experts"!
"Where is Albert Shanker now that we need him?" - Walt Sautter
Sunday, 30 December 2012
Thursday, 20 December 2012
Sunday, 16 December 2012
What a Suprise!!
Budget task force sees major fiscal challenges ahead for N.J.
Thursday, December 13, 2012 Last updated: Thursday December 13, 2012, 1:56 PM
BY JOHN REITMEYER
STATE HOUSE BUREAU
The Record
Thursday, December 13, 2012 Last updated: Thursday December 13, 2012, 1:56 PM
BY JOHN REITMEYER
STATE HOUSE BUREAU
The Record
No matter who wins the 2013 gubernatorial election,
New Jersey will continue to face some steep fiscal challenges unless major
budget reforms are enacted.
A new report on New Jersey’s finances released Thursday
by the State Budget Task Force said heavy debt, a grossly underfunded pension
system, looming federal spending cuts and an “eroding and volatile tax
structure” are all among the “difficult choices” the state faces in the years
ahead when it comes to budget policies.
The report, one of six the task force is compiling
at the state level, spelled out each major issue in New Jersey in stark terms.
The state will need to come up with $133 billion
over the next 10 years to meet infrastructure needs. New Jersey is also
carrying $33.7 billion in debt, which is more than the current state budget and
among the highest of all state’s per-capita.
The property tax burden in New Jersey has risen to
$25 billion statewide.
The state’s annual obligation to the public employee
pension system – a payment that has been skipped or only partially funded for
the last several years – will sit at $5.5 billion in just five years, which is
five times the amount Governor Christie put in the current state budget.
And since the state is relying on $12 billion in
funds from the federal government, even a 10 percent cut that could result from
the looming federal fiscal and spending policy changes generally referred to as
the fiscal cliff could cost the state $1.2 billion.
“Balancing budgets, to say the least, is going to be
a challenge,” said Richard Keevey, distinguished practitioner in residence at
Rutgers University’s School of Public Affairs and Administration and an author
of the report.
Christie, a Republican, has already said he’s
running for re-election in 2013. And Democratic leaders are waiting to hear
from Newark Mayor Cory Booker, who has expressed interest in challenging
Christie but has yet to make a final decision. State Sen. Barbara, D-Middlesex,
filed paperwork earlier this week to run for governor.
Other possible Democratic candidates include U.S.
Rep. Bill Pascrell, D-Paterson, state Sen. Richard J. Codey, D-Essex, and state
Senate President Steve Sweeney, D-Gloucester, and state Assemblyman Lou
Greenwald, D-Camden.
No matter who wins in 2013, they will have to
confront the significant budget issues spelled out in the report. One major question is whether tax hikes
would be needed, something Christie has resisted doing since taking office in
early 2010.
The report said a complete review of the tax and
spending structures at the state and local levels is long overdue.
The task force’s advisory board is co-chaired by
former Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker and former New York Lt. Gov.
Richard Ravitch. They started the project in 2011, and issued an overview
report in July 2012.
The in-depth report on New Jersey’s budget issues is
one of six state-level studies. The other state reports cover budget issues in
California, Illinois, New York, Texas and Virginia.
Both Volcker and Ravitch appeared with Keevey to go
over the New Jersey report Thursday morning at a hotel in Trenton.
They were reluctant to cast blame for some of the
major budget issues — such as the skipped pension payments or a reliance
one-shot revenue gimmicks — on any one party or governor.
“It’s very, very tempting to respond to the
inevitable questions about politics,” Ravitch said. “There were dumb things
done on a bipartisan basis.”
And though the report made a series of
recommendations — including more multi-year budget planning, regular funding of
the pension system, and the tax and spending review – the men did not advocate
for any specific solution, such as tax hikes or spending cuts. That is better
left to the elected officials, they said.
They also said the response to superstorm Sandy only
highlights the need for a sharp focus on the budget issues.
“It all comes back to the same question of
priorities,” Volcker said.
******
From Media Matters
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2011/03/07/doesnt-anyone-remember-christine-whitman/177285
"The first thing Christine Todd Whitman did upon taking office as governor of New Jersey in January was to cut the state's income tax. Then in July, as she signed into law her first state budget, the Republican cut taxes again while simultaneously closing the huge deficit left by her predecessor.
This is what her supporters call the Whitman miracle, the fiscal accomplishment that has sent her stock soaring among
New Jersey's voters and transformed her on the national scene from a political unknown into one of the Republican Party's newest stars.
But the key to the Whitman miracle lies neither in her political philosophy nor in her spending cuts, but rather in the fine print of her budget. Contained there is a series of arcane fiscal changes that some experts say amount to this: Christine Todd Whitman has balanced New Jersey's books and paid for her tax cut by quietly diverting more than $1 billion from the state's pension fund.Whitman calls what she did a "reform" of the pension system that puts it on a more "sound actuarial footing."
Others are less charitable. The one thing that even the actuarial consultants hired by the Whitman administration agree on, however, is that the chief effect of the changes will be to shift billions of dollars in pension obligations onto New Jersey taxpayers 15 to 20 years from now."
*****
My Comments-
And McGreevy and Corzine followed suit. All raided the pension fund or back doored it to allow increased spending and tax cuts so as to enhance their chances of reelection.
Essentially, then, the pension fund contributed to the political campaigns of all these past governors and is continuing to do so with Christie. He is not contributing nearly what is required.
I really thought the contributions were required by law but if you are the governor it seems the law doesn't apply.
And now there's a shortfall?
What a surprise!
It's all some sad BS perpetrated on retired workers, future retired workers and the New Jersey citizens.
And -
How about the federal government?
They spend trillions on "defense" (I don't know who we are defending against)
They spend billions on "The War of Drugs" and haven't won one battle yet!
They spend billions on Foreign Aid (much of which is used to arm foreign countries)
They spend billions keeping troops in countries such as Germany, Japan, South Korea, etc. Why do we have to have military outposts in these countries continually since WW II?
I think we all know why.
So tens of thousands of patronage jobs are made available for politicians to dole out and so military contractors and arms manufacturers (who employ cadres of lobbyists) can reap huge profits from taxpayer dollars.
Maybe it's time for the feds to stop all this wanton spending and start spending on our own people by helping to balance state budgets and improving our infrastructure!
They say "A fish rots from the head down" but in this case I think the whole fish (state politics and federal politics) are rotted !
I ask again, "What do you think??"
Tuesday, 11 December 2012
Why We Should Expect Disrespect !
This
memo was distributed to the staff at a local suburban high school was posted on
the town's Internet message board.
******
Folks-
oversight on my part - but an important piece from Mr. F as we move to the
mid-point of the year.
Quoting
Mr. F
"As
many of you are aware we have had an inexcusable number of fights and events in
our building over the last few weeks. As Dave and I work together to manage
discipline I have been experiencing a number of extremely disrespectful
students. This behavior is not acceptable on any level. If you confront a
student who is disrespectful please send them down and they will be dealt with
accordingly. To help alleviate discipline problems please aim to plan lessons
and activities that begin and continue through the bell. Also, your presence in
the hallway between periods is recognized by the students and so I ask that you
assist us as much as possible. Thank you!"
I
would like to add that you should not have to deal with consistent surliness in
your classrooms--- Send them down-- we will send them out.
D
W
Principal
High
School
******
Some
replies to this post, blamed the Governor amongst other things for the increase
in disrespectful and aggressive behavior at the school.
Some
other subsequent posts defended him.
I
replied as follows:
"It
disturbs me that you are finding a way to blame the Governor for this" (A
quote from one of the posts)
Here's
how the Governor and all those who constantly bash teachers are to blame.
Kids
are not stupid!
When
they see public officials and the public in general show little or no respect
for teachers they figure, why should they?
How
can you expect children to respect someone who is continually referred to as
"greedy, lazy, poor performing, a leech, overpaid, under worked, in it
strictly for the time off, etc."?
Additionally,
teachers are frequently chided for not making it "interesting
enough".
If
only they did, all children would learn and flowers would bloom in every
classroom.
In
other words, we want teachers to be entertainers for forty two minutes every
class period.
If
the child doesn't pay attention, do the work and learn, then it must be the
teacher's fault because he hasn't been entertaining enough.
If
the child isn't entertained sufficiently, the teacher is doing a poor job and
the student has the right to act up and be disruptive.
If
the child is sent out of the class for poor behavior then the teacher is
labeled as "not being able to control the class".
Trust
me, Socrates couldn't teach a disruptive class!
If
the student refuses to participate in learning, it is the teacher's fault
because he hasn't "engaged" the student.
This
mentality has been foisted on public education by politicians and educational
"experts" many of whom haven't been in a classroom in decades (if
ever) but continue to pontificate and dictate.
The
saddest part of all is the public continues to believe it.
At
a later point in the message board conversation I wrote:
Teachers
and schools have little authority and what little they have is becoming less
day after day.
If
a child is given a poor grade, it is because the teacher is a poor teacher.
If
a child is disciplined, he is being bullied.
If
a coach requires a child to do an extra push up because of poor performance, he
is the victim of corporal punishment. (Believe it or not asking a child to
write "I will behave" fifty times is considered corporal punishment!)
If
the child does poorly on a state test, it is because he hasn't been taught
well.
If
a child is disruptive, it is because the teacher hasn't made it
"interesting" enough.
And
to top it off, every one has an Uncle Joe who is a lawyer eager to pursue all
these injustices!
Additionally,
to address the fight issue.
If
a teacher intercedes in a fight and a child claims injury, the teacher is
punished.
If
a teacher intercedes in a fight and a child claims any sexual infringement, the
teacher is fired or worse.
If
a teacher does not intercede in a fight and a child is injured, the teacher is
neglectful.
If
the teacher is injured - well tough luck for him (or her).
Talk
about no win!
******
What
are your thoughts on student behavior, how it affects classroom learning and manner in
which discipline is handled at your school?
Wednesday, 5 December 2012
What Do You Think??
I have received comments about my proposal to ask for your
ideas regarding educational questions in my future posts.
I am including them below and also posing a question as I
suggested I would.
Here is a prelude to the question.
In Jersee (as we like to call it), we have had over the past
decades, the following educational schemes, instituted and imposed by the State:
The Urban Hope Act
No Child Left
Behind (NCLB)
The Race to the Top
The Quality Education Act (QEA)
Thorough and Efficient (T&E)
High School Proficiency
(HSPT), (HSPT9), (HSTP11)
Grade Eight
Proficiency Assessment (GEPA)
Quality Single Accountability Continuum (QSAC)
Comprehensive
Education Improvement and Financing Act (CEIFA)
NJ ASK 3, NJ ASK 4, NJ
ASK 3-8
Minimum Basic Skills
testing program (MBS)
Early Warning Test (EWT)
Alternate Proficiency Assessment (APA)
Elementary School Proficiency Assessment (ESPA)
The Open Classroom
Core Curriculum
Content Standards
and
The Charter School
craze!
I hope I haven't missed any. There's an allow lot to
remember! If I have, please remind me.
Question:
Which, if any
of the aforementioned plans, have had any success in improving New Jersey
education or education in general?
Which, if any,
have proved negative for education and teaching?
And, if you
could devise a plan to improve education, what would be its prime components?
Please your reply to:
****
Here are some of the letters which I have received regarding
my previous post:
Walt,
I stumbled
upon your blog through High School Herd, through Pinterest, while looking for
math ideas for my high school classroom in Ohio. I am at a career and technical
center serving grades 11 and 12, teaching Intermediate Algebra/Geometry and
Algebra 2. I am also the numeracy coach (for one period of the day).
Your
comments and feelings are echoed here in Ohio. I assume the culture of the
profession and unions is similar across the country. I think the site is a
great idea and would be proud to contribute to the cause. At worst, I could
occasionally share some perspective from my state.
It was
surprising that your blog was only a few days old. I was expecting at least a
few years worth of comments. I have been teaching since 1999 and my first full
year started with an eight day strike. I have been at my current district since
2007 and have certainly noticed a shift in the mindset of communities as well
as union members.
Back to
teaching! Looking forward to hearing back from you.
Jeff E.
*****
Sounds great! I'm in.
Peg Nicholson
Missouri Information Coordinator
Save Our Schools March and National Call to Action
Washington, D.C. & Nationwide | July 28-31, 2011
http://www.saveourschoolsmarch.org
Follow SOS on Twitter: @SOSMarch
NEW! Connect With Other Supporters in the SOS Forums!
Save Our Schools March and National Call to Action
Missouri Information Coordinator
Save Our Schools March and National Call to Action
Washington, D.C. & Nationwide | July 28-31, 2011
http://www.saveourschoolsmarch.org
Follow SOS on Twitter: @SOSMarch
NEW! Connect With Other Supporters in the SOS Forums!
Save Our Schools March and National Call to Action
****
Thank you Jeff and Peg for your replies.
Saturday, 1 December 2012
The Past, The Present, and The Future of Teaching
A teenager was brought into the Principal's office to be
disciplined. The Principal spoke.
"Your teacher has told me you are ignorant and apathetic. What do you have to say for yourself?"
The teenager thought for a moment and then replied.
"I don't know what that means and I don't care!"
Do today's teachers exhibit the same mentality?
Are they ignorant of how much effort was required of their predecessors so as to enable them to enjoy the benefits of today's
teaching profession? (Benefits which are rapidly being eroded.)
Are they apathetic to the fight to maintain those benefits?
Do they merely take them for granted?
I wonder!
Over the past two years I have posted close to a hundred
items. They primarily dealt with my observations and experiences pertaining to
education.
During my forty years of teaching, at both the secondary and
college level, I witnessed tremendous improvement in the status of the
profession.
When I started in 1965, bargaining and negotiations were
non existent. It was pretty much we went "hat in hand" to the Board
of Education and relied on their largess.
In the years following, during the seventies, teachers
worked hard to change those circumstances. Many engaged in political action,
many walked picket lines and endured strikes and some even went to jail.
In the end, after much strife, the profession gained fair
wages and benefits as well as renewed respect from the public, administrators
and the politicians.
It took a good twenty years of hard work but it was worth
it. People gained pride in themselves and in their profession and were eager
to say "Yes, I'm a teacher". It came to a point where teachers were
actually invited to participate in decision making regarding education and
their opinions were valued.
I retired in 2004 and since then I have seen a rapid decline
in all that for which we worked so hard.
Today, when some say "Yes, I'm a teacher" he is
perceived as greedy, lazy and possessing poor work ethics. All these negative
stereotypes are constantly reinforced by the media and self serving politicos.
Teachers are no
longer asked to participate or make
suggestions as to the improvement of our schools. They are merely being held
responsible for the poor outcomes of the plans and schemes implemented by
"educational experts" and politicians.
All programs and regulations of the past, proposed and
enacted by these "experts" have been abject failures as evidenced by
the fact that they are continually replaced by new programs and schemes.
Additionally, the State's two decade
takeover of the poorest city schools has resulted in no progress what so
ever.
Now, since none of the aforementioned has worked, the only
plan left seems to be, blame the teachers and then transfer the schools into
private, for profit hands.
All this has occurred since 2004 and is accelerating.
You might ask me, "Why do you care? You're
retired".
Here's why!
Teachers have become like abused children lacking self
respect and fearful. They are constantly required to succumb to the dictates of
arrogant, condescending supervisors. Rarely are they allowed to pursue their
own worthwhile approaches in educating our children. I find it depressing to see the profession in which I spent my
entire life being reduced to that of an unappreciated, ridiculed field hand.
I would like to begin to use this blog as an outlet for
teacher's daily frustration and anger and help the profession to regain the
pride that once existed.
It pains me to see all that has been achieved over the past
forty years being erased without some much as a whimper.
I've said this before. ( I am sure you know, as a teacher
you say things over and over again in the classroom and the habit just follows
you into your social conversation without your even realizing it.)
Ross Perot, when at Ford once said, and I paraphrase,
"Unless a manager goes down to the factory floor and puts a wheel on a car
once in a while, he can't be a good manager".
I would like to see the opinions and thoughts of those
"on the factory floor" heeded and respected. Those people are you who read this blog.
I am considering posing questions about education and
teaching and asking for your comments and suggestions. I would then like to
post them, with or without the author's name, and get a conversation going
about the real problems and solutions in education.
This, hopefully, could be the start of an effective way to
stem the tide of teacher bashing and disrespect. I think it could serve the
cause better than just my constant diatribes and ranting.
Having your voice
heard, I believe, will lead to greater
self esteem and promote challenges to the forces that would destroy our
profession.
What do you think?
A good idea or not?
Something in which you would be willing to participate?
Drop me a line and tell me what you think? Thanks.
Walt
Walt
Click here to Email
PS
I really see NJEA doing little to fight back. (I don't even
see their sappy ads on TV any more!)
It is disheartening to say the least when a
"powerful" union as they would like to call themselves, doing little
or nothing for their members. (Members who send them tons of money each and
every pay day!)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)